What got me started

What really got me going was the Republicans having only men on the (first) panel of their anti-contraceptive coverage hearing. And their denial of women’s voices.

This issue is disturbing on many levels. It has also been disturbing that so many support this nonsense. Especially (some) women. I decided I needed an entire blog to flush it all out.

There are some who insist this is all a great distraction from the jobs/economics issues – but the issues are all connected.

Healthcare -> economics.

Birth-control -> economics.

Patriarchal religions -> misogyny -> economics.

Republicans (being anti-abortion) -> economics.

Republicans (being anti-birth-control) -> economics.

Corporate and religious influence on government (esp. Republicans) -> economics.

Republicans (insistence that the wealthy & corporations shouldn’t be taxed = no money for health or other services) -> economics.

The Republican idea that any group can opt out of paying any sort of health care need for their employees -> economics.

It’s difficult to know how much some of these characters have actually thought about the consequences or precipitators of their actions. For example – the economy is bad – so somewhere in their minds Republicans might get the idea that if women were not active in the job force then there would be more jobs for more men. Since most of the manufacturing jobs are being done in other countries – then if women were staying home pregnant and raising children – then the men could take their places.

If that was one of their reasons – it would be easy to point out that one low to middling paying job isn’t paying enough to live on anyway – for one thing. For another thing, a lot of families are single parent families with the mother being the single parent. A lot of times, the men walk away, hide assets / have jobs under the table. Some would rather not work that contribute to the economic well-being of their offspring. (I’ve heard many stories from people whose job it is to try to get these guys – mostly guys – to pay up).

There could be ways to fix that – for instance in Denmark, both parents, share 50/50 custody and responsibility. Of course that means both parents need have equal access to equally well-paying jobs. Both parents have to stick around and be present in their children’s lives. It requires more, not less equality. But here Republicans are working actively for women to have less equality.

It seems obvious that the Republicans are trying to take the culture back to when (heterosexual) women were dependent on men – across the board. The general consequences of women having less access to birth-control, to jobs, to healthcare – is a greater state of dependency and poverty for women and children.

Republicans seem to be banking on enough men having economic problems – that if women can be blamed in a side-door sort of way – then they will win the day. I would bet (partly based on past polls) that the people in favor of the Republican ideology are either working men who have the idea that the Republicans are going to empower them; and the already powerful men who want to keep their positions and improve on them. Many women who see themselves hanging onto and benefitting from the patriarchal system also often go along with this.

One of my theories about that is that these women see the world through the male gaze and not their own – so they don’t see that it could be better for them any other way.

Many, many women know that they like having more control over their lives and having more independence (even if they do like being married), than what women had 50 years ago. Before 2nd-wave feminism and easier access to reliable birth control methods, this was a different world. Those with better means had access to doctors and birth control methods, but birth control was illegal for unmarried women. For many women, many children meant a life of poverty. It was a different world.

It is completely unrealistic on so many levels to think that our country would be better off without reasonable access to birth-control. All of the myriad ways that some are putting up roadblocks is ridiculous, absurd, and annoying.

To the extent that we could put our minds and our efforts to better use than re-defending all this – it is a nonsensical distraction. But if people don’t understand this – they need to be educated some how or another. (It is a great discouragement that it is almost impossible to get through to these people, though. Yesterday Rush Limbaugh dished out to the masses the frame that Sandra Fluke (whom the Republicans denied access to speak at the hearing) must be a “slut” and a “prostitute” because she wants others to pay for her birth control. Some wankers will eat it up 😦

Her argument, for those who bothered to listen was that many women use birth control for health reasons besides preventing pregnancy. Personally, I think that having birth control as part of ones overall healthcare plan is perfectly reasonable, even if there were no other problems that the pills were helping with.

Much more later.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s